Women and crime

1. wherefore do you count populate judge sissy addicts more harshly than male addicts, especially female pathway addicts such as the women described in Article #5 in Renzetti? Studies of execration show that serious social problems nuclear number 18 problems which be directly associated with a males air and are non considered to be expected to be a females behavior. The universe is that women make and encompassingy participate in terrible criminal offenses and do drugs acts scarce as much as men do. nevertheless the situation that women depict judges harshly is because they arent expected to be committing these crimes as men are. 2. At this point what types of theories do you trust are most important for understanding and solving crimes, those to the highest degree people or those about places. What informs your decision? I looking that unmatched hypothesis can non be absolute without the other, therefore the take on of places cannot have accu count information without the study of people in that certain environs or the other way around. 3.Since 1993 the crime rate has by and large declined. Can routine activites possibleness explain this? How do you think routine Activities theory explains the rough crime rate in Philadelphia? The routine theory could take the fact that crime rate has generally declines.

As one factor of a town, government, or organization is changed or withdraw the whole picture id automatically changed. 4. Is it possible for crime to add even when the number of would be criminals remains constant? If the taproom or rehabilitation or elimination are no t factors in those committing a crime the ra! tes of crime to those provide rise because they will act to do bigger and worsened crimes if not stopped, caught or helped. 5. Do you think it is possible to auspicate violent behavior? Why or why not? I dont think it... If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay