Malcolm Xs Ideologies Before Mecca Following... Essay

Historians have often divided the life of Malcolm X, also referred to as El-Hajj Malik Shabazz, into 3 periods. First, from 1948 to 1964, he was established in the Nation of Islam. Then, in 1964, he went through the Black Nationalist Period of his life. Lastly, prior to his assassination, from 1964 to 1965, Malcolm X evolved through the Universalist Islamic Period. I, however, have chosen to divide his life into two major periods from which his most poignant ideologies were formed. He demonstrated that reading, learning and reason were indispensable qualities for the economic and social development of the masses. Within these two distinctly opposing periods of Malcolm X’s life, his ideologies, prior to and following his holy pilgrimage to†¦show more content†¦He and his followers were strong willed and determined to reach justice, by any means necessary. Malcolm X had a goal, and this goal was to put an end to â€Å"giving birth to children who see no hope for the fu ture but to follow our miserable footsteps.† Every Muslim is commanded to make the pilgrimage to Mecca at a certain point in their lives. Once Malcolm X traveled to Mecca, letters sent to the states spoke of encounters with â€Å"such sincere hospitality and overwhelming spirit of true brotherhood as is practiced by people of all colors and races.† The brotherhood, justice and respect for each others rights, that he only dreamed and spoke of in the past was finally becoming a pleasant reality. Amongst tens of thousands of pilgrims, Malcolm X saw brotherhood and unity exemplified by all, regardless of race or color. It became evident that such an uplifting and enlightening experience would shape the rest of his life as well as guide his actions towards justice as well. It is clear that Hajj guided Malcolm X towards righteousness, equalitarian justice and a retreat from his hatred of whites. This newfound ideology following his pilgrimage to Mecca allowed him the opportunity to enhance his knowledge of other worlds, and hence, other value systems.

Communication Is Vital For Success And Living A Normal Life

Communication amongst human beings has always been vital for survival. Anymore, communication is vital for success and living a normal life. If one lacks the ability to communicate, it can be an extreme challenge to live a normal life. Males and females often communicate differently and sometimes can communicate the same. â€Å"Differences between ‘gender cultures’ influence the way that people of different genders communicate. These differences begin at childhood† (Boundless). They have different ways of reacting, different objectives, body language, and different ways of communicating with one another. Later, you will discover how genders differ when it comes to communication during social interaction, in the workplace, with a significant†¦show more content†¦The first issue that will be discussed is the fact that â€Å"women feel left out during conversations† (Evans). These conversations that women feel left out in are debates at work, regular conversations, and decision making conversations. Women like to be invited into conversations because they feel more accepted if someone else shows sympathy toward the female’s opinion or view. Females tend to keep quiet during debates between men because of the fact that they want to be invited in. Many men don’t feel the need to invite the female in because she isn’t speaking and they feel as if the female has nothing to say. It isn’t hard to see the miscommunication in this situation. They both are picking up false messages and are drawing logical conclusions based on the information that they are given. I have experienced this in the work place myself. I work in at a male dominant cement plant that contains very few females. Most of these females don’t seem to fit in with the rest of the guys when it comes to simple conversation and debate. The women tend to keep quiet more than the men do. Another difference between genders at work is â€Å"m en think that women ask too many questions† (Evans). Some men think that these questions asked by women inhibit progress and take too much time. Many women claim that asking questions is their best way to contribute. They feel that it sparks an exchange of ideas and that it shows concern for others. The best way that genders can team up and work

Finance 3220 Problem Set 1 Free Essays

What is the present value of $150,000 to be received 8 years from today if the discount rate is 11 percent? Question 1 options: | A)|   $65,088. 97| | B)|   $71,147. 07| | C)|   $74,141. We will write a custom essay sample on Finance 3220 Problem Set 1 or any similar topic only for you Order Now 41| | D)|   $79,806. 18| | E)|   $83,291. 06 | Question 2 (2 points) According to the Rule of 72, you can do which one of the following? Question 2 options: | A)|   double your money in five years at 7. 2 percent interest| | B)|   double your money in 7. 2 years at 8 percent interest| | C)|   double your money in 8 years at 9 percent interest| | D)|   triple your money in 7. years at 5 percent interest| | E)|   triple your money at 10 percent interest in 7. 2 years  | Question 3 (2 points) On your ninth birthday, you received $300 which you invested at 4. 5 percent interest, compounded annually. Your investment is now worth $757. How old are you today? Question 3 options: | A)|   age 29| | B)|   age 30| | C)|   age 31| | D)|   age 32| | E)|   age 33| Question 4 (2 points) You just received a $5,000 gift from your grandmother. You have decided to save this money so that you can gift it to your grandchildren 50 years from now. How much additional money will you have to gift to your grandchildren if you can earn an average of 8. 5 percent instead of just 8 percent on your savings? Question 4 options: | A)|   $47,318. 09| | B)|   $52,464. 79| | C)|   $55,211. 16| | D)|   $58,811. 99| | E)|   $60,923. 52 | Question 5 (2 points) Shelley won a lottery and will receive $1,000 a year for the next ten years. The value of her winnings today discounted at her discount rate is called which one of the following? Question 5 options: | A)|   single amount| | B)|   future value| | C)|   present value| D)|   simple amount| | E)|   compounded value | Question 6 (2 points) Andy deposited $3,000 this morning into an account that pays 5 percent interest, compounded annually. Barb also deposited $3,000 this morning into an account that pays 5 percent interest, compounded annually. Andy will withdraw his interest earnings and spend it as soon as possible. Barb will reinvest her interest earnings into her acc ount. Given this, which one of the following statements is true? Question 6 options: | A)|   Barb will earn more interest the first year than Andy will. | B)|   Andy will earn more interest in year three than Barb will. | | C)|   Barb will earn interest on interest. | | D)|   After five years, Andy and Barb will both have earned the same amount of interest. | | E)|   Andy will earn compound interest. | Question 7 (2 points) You invested $1,650 in an account that pays 5 percent simple interest. How much more could you have earned over a 20-year period if the interest had compounded annually? Question 7 options: | A)|   $849. 22| | B)|   $930. 11| | C)|   $982. 19| | D)|   $1,021. 15| | E)|   $1,077. 94 | Question 8 (2 points) A year ago, you deposited $30,000 into a retirement savings account at a fixed rate of 5. 5 percent. Today, you could earn a fixed rate of 6. 5 percent on a similar type account. However, your rate is fixed and cannot be adjusted. How much less could you have deposited last year if you could have earned a fixed rate of 6. 5 percent and still have the same amount as you currently will when you retire 38 years from today? Question 8 options: | A)|   $2,118. 42 less| | B)|   $3,333. 33 less| | C)|   $5,417. 09 less| | D)|   $7,274. 12 less| | E)|   $9,234. 97 less  | Question 9 (2 points) You are investing $100 today in a savings account at your local bank. Which one of the following terms refers to the value of this investment one year from now? Question 9 options: | A)|   future value| | B)|   present value| | C)|   principal amounts| | D)|   discounted value| | E)|   invested principal | Question 10 (2 points) One year ago, you invested $1,800. Today it is worth $1,924. 62. What rate of interest did you earn? Question 10 options: | A)|   6. 59 percent| | B)|   6. 67 percent| | C)|   6. 88 percent| | D)|   6. 92 percent| | E)|   7. 01 percent | How to cite Finance 3220 Problem Set 1, Essay examples

Language and Power-Free-Samples for Students-Myassignmenthelp

Question: Discuss about the Language and Power. Answer: Power resides only where men believe it resides. [...] A shadow on the wall, yet shadows can kill. And ofttimes a very small man can cast a very large shadow. The above quoted lines of George R.R. Martin from his famous work A Clash of Kings clearly outline the nature as well as the importance which is generally associated with the concept of power. It is to be noted that since the ancient times the greatness of a person is generally measured in terms of the power which he or she has amassed over the course of their life (Harker, Mahar Wilkes, 2016). Therefore, in the opinion of Plato, the Greek scholar The measure of a man is what he does with power. This essay intends to give an overview of the concept of language and power in the context of Pierre Bourdieus theory of language and power. Pierre Felix Bourdieu (1930-2002) was a French sociologist, anthropologist, philosopher, and public intellectual and most of his works concerned itself with the dynamics of power and of their use in the common everyday language (Jenkins, 2014). His theory of language and power is such a one where he gives an overview of his ideas about the use of power in the common everyday language and how that particular language is used to exert influence over others (Harker, Mahar Wilkes, 2016). It is to be noted that in this particular paper he gives a pertinent account of his views about the concept of power and the way it should be used. The concept of precondition has been defined by Bourdieu as the basic criteria or the condition which must be fulfilled before the desired objective can be achieved (Jenkins, 2014). Therefore, in the specific context which Bourdieu uses the desired goal is the achievement of power and the precondition is the criteria which is essential for the attainment of that condition. It is to be noted that Bourdieu uses the concept of symbolic domination to refer to the way in which the concept of power is used by the various entities for the maintenance of domination over the other entities or individuals (Bourdieu, 1998). In the opinion of Bourdieu, power refers to the ability or the capacity of a particular individual or person to direct or influence the normal course of activities of other peoples lives (Bourdieu, 1998). The concept of misrecognition, on the other hand has been defined by Bourdieu as the lack of ability of the individuals to recognize the true source of the power. It is oft en that the people misrecognise the true source of power and think that it originates from the individual or the person who is sitting on the throne (Bourdieu, 1998). The concept of legitimated variety, on the other hand, has been defined by Bourdieu as the concept by means of which the individual or the person can find out the source of the power and can make a judgment whether it is legitimate or not (Bourdieu, 1998). It is to be noted that Bourdieu claims that there should be variety in power and that it should not be centered in the hands of one particular person but equally distributed among all the individuals just like in the case of democracy. Bourdieu defines the concept of stratified societies as the ones which have been segregated on the basis of the various factors like social, economic, cultural and others (Bourdieu, 1998). It is to be noted that although Bourdieu lists all these factors on the basis of which the various societies have been segregated however his main concern is in the segregation of society on the basis of power. It is to be noted that Bourdieu further uses the concept o f standard as well as correctness to define the power which the individuals hold over the other people (Bourdieu, 1998). In the opinion of Bourdieu various individuals use the concept of standard as well as correctness to justify their right to power as well as the use of it. It is to be noted that language plays an important role in this particular process as the rhetoric of language is often used by the people in power to justify their claim to power (Bourdieu, 1991). The four types of capital namely the economic, social and cultural are symbolic as they represent misrecognition of the concept of power. It is to be noted that people generally associate power with the amount of social, cultural as well as economic wealth without taking into consideration the true source of the power. It is to be noted that since the traditional times power is often held in high esteem by the various entities of the world. The people or the individuals who hold power generally use various concepts to justify their right to power. In the opinion of Bourdieu these people use the concepts of correctness, standard, legitimate variety and others to justify their right to power and also the power which they hold (Swartz, 2012). It is often seen that there is a misconception about the concepts of power and legitimacy. Many a time it is seen that the people in power use the construct of language to legitimize the power which they hold. Therefore, from the above discussion it becomes apparent that the theorist Bourdieu sees power as a means which has been used by the various individuals in such a manner to dominate the other individuals. It is to be noted that language plays a significant role in this particular process as the tool of language is often used by the various individuals to retain their power and also to justify their claim or right to power. Therefore, it would not be too far-fetched to say that both the concepts of power as well as language go hand in hand in the process of wielding of power. References Bourdieu, P. (1991).Language and symbolic power. Harvard University Press. Bourdieu, P. (1998).Practical reason: On the theory of action. Stanford University Press. Bourdieu, P. (1998).The state nobility: Elite schools in the field of power. Stanford University Press. Harker, R., Mahar, C., Wilkes, C. (Eds.). (2016).An introduction to the work of Pierre Bourdieu: The practice of theory. Springer. Jenkins, R. (2014).Pierre bourdieu. Routledge. Swartz, D. (2012).Culture and power: The sociology of Pierre Bourdieu. University of Chicago Press.